Pages

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

soldiery Intelligence: A True Oxymoron if not a hazardous Blend

For some reason, the mean American people is awed by the presence of high government officials, especially those reputed by menagerial agency sources and the media to have been privy to state secrets as spies or brain agents. They are said to have such honest eyes and believable faces. I suppose that modern movies, which portray exaggerated and propagandized renditions of fictional federal brain operations and the heroic paramilitary agents who go about saving the world from disaster, are responsible in large part for the public's favorable impression of pro spies. Porter Goss is one of those individuals about whom a curriculum vitae has been officially written and circulated by extremely talented government propagandists who have recently regaled the impressionable U.S hoi polloi with stories about Goss's forty-year aid with the federal government. Little, however, is indeed known about the real Porter Goss, and other people like him, who have done the clandestine bidding of the Central brain Agency, the federal spy corps with the yearly three billion dollar budget.

All we indeed know about Goss is that he graduated from Yale in 1960, joined the U.S. Army, and was later recruited into the Cia in 1962. After that point, Mr. Goss became a shadowy pro prevaricator, in the ambiguous name of national security, and assumed a trail of pseudonyms and aliases which accompanied him on his exploits in espionage throughout the world. What Mr. Goss officially did as a Cia operative has been classified regardless of either or not the particular doing was, or was not, sanctioned by Congress. If the covert operations were properly sanctioned by the House and Senate oversight committees, they, in most cases, were correctly classified as top-secret. If the operations weren't sanctioned, and were illegal rogue activities (which in many cases they was), they was comfortably classified in order to obfuscate the devastating truth.

News From Laos

One of the more tantalizing aspects of Porter Goss' federal vocation was his continued under-cover employment with the Cia clandestine services during the time he was supposedly a newspaper publisher and a Florida congressman. official sources say Goss retired from the Cia in 1970 due to health matters, but other much more dependable sources narrative that he didn't indeed retire, but assumed cover as an ex-Cia member when he began publishing a Florida newspaper, The Island Reporter, with two other old agents.

In 1974, Goss was formally appointed to the City Council of Sanibel, Florida and was later elected as the city's mayor. Time passed while Goss assumed a foremost Republican Party status in Florida politics while still on the Cia payroll. In 1983, Goss was abruptly appointed by Florida's Governor, Bob Graham, to be on the Lee County Commissioner Board. By 1988, Goss had attained so much political popularity and leverage that he declared himself a candidate for Congress with Republican Party approval, and subsequently won a seat in the House of Representatives while still employed by the Cia. This premeditated failure to disclose his pro association and alignment with the Cia to the Florida electorate was in violation of federal choosing law. What Goss has done in Congress since 1988 to enlarge the conservative Republican and Cia-Nsa agendas may only be a matter of speculation. Yet, his appointment by Dubya as Cia Director, in 2002, came as no surprise to those who were aware of Goss's continued association with the agency. His immediate confirmation by the U.S. Senate was quite laughable, with those senior committee Senators, who knew about Goss' ongoing association with the Cia, pretending that he indeed retired in 1970. The truth about the Goss merger, of the brain community with the troops and federal politics, is indeed appalling, and begs the query of how many more active spies have been elected to Congress as senators and representatives?

The stark reality about the Cia is frequently difficult to handle, especially by those who elevate its leaders to high positions on the morality pedestal. What we do know as facts about the Cia, after its inception in 1948, comprises a litany of corruption, deceit, and false representations to the American public. Remember that it was the Cia that covertly used American soldiers and marines in Vietnam, in 1968 and later, as guinea pigs in horrible experiments to rule the effects of Lsd and other hallucinogenic chemicals on the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese regulars. As many as 200 young soldiers and marines unknowingly suffered permanent neurological damage as a corollary of the illicit experimentation, of which the menagerial subject has, of course, summarily denied any knowledge.

In 1947, after the Army's Office of Strategic Services was transformed into the Cia, there was a quarterly hidden flow of Nazi scientists and Gestapo agents, genuine war criminals, into the ranks of the troops brain corps, which was the vanguard of the newly organized Cia. This utter hypocrisy practiced by the Cia, and the later-organized Nsa, under the nose of Congress, was kept away from the American communal straight through a thoroughly refined menagerial subject propaganda ministry. This well-oiled Machiavellian tax-financed government machine was the later means of keeping the facts about the illegal onset of Vietnam away from the American public. It was before, and after, 1962, that the Cia controlled most of the operational strategies used in Southeast Asia by the U.S. troops commands.

It was the Cia that grossly misrepresented the normal elections in Saigon, in 1964, in showing that American intervention was favored by a majority of the South Vietnamese people. The U.S. News media reflected in print, and on television, the manipulative efforts of the Cia and Nsa to deceive the American voters. Lyndon B. Johnson knew, however, that the majority of the South Vietnamese wanted the American troops to leave Vietnam, but exhibited unrestrained hubris and continued to escalate the fighting, which resulted in the eventual deaths of over 58,000 American warriors. In 1968, Porter Goss was among the Cia operatives who were finally responsible for the implementation of operational troops procedure in Laos, and Cambodia. In all likelihood, he was one of the prime movers of the political strategies that exacerbated the troops confrontation against the North Vietnamese people, which lasted fourteen years and ended in humiliating defeat for the United States.

The diastrophic corollary which has resulted from using troops personnel to contribute brain operations for the Cia and Nsa, has proven to be almost fascist in nature. Any troops aid thrives on an austere implementation of an effective dictatorship, where the dogface Gi is strictly required, at the threat of death or other severe punishment, to corollary orders, either or not the orders are moral and legal. The U.S. troops is governed under such a set of regulations known as the Uniform Code of troops Justice, not the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

By enlisting in the U.S. Military, a person, in most cases, unknowingly signs away his constitutional rights and becomes troops property. Most troops commanders will speak that the mean enlisted soldier or maritime does not have the mental capability of determining either or not a direct order is official and moral. The subordinate warrior is thinkable, to corollary orders without asking questions. This factor is what makes the grunt warrior expendable when orders are issued requiring that immoral and illegal acts be committed in the amorphous name of national security. Therefore, by putting the troops in fee of brain gathering and the implementation of subversive menagerial orders (which currently have all the force of statutes), the overall corollary is inevitably aversive to the maintenance of the constitutionally mandated divorce of powers in the middle of the legislative and menagerial branches. Porter Goss is the perfect example of the many paramilitary Gs-14 civilian spies who have routinely put on the uniforms of field grade troops officers in order to deceive and manipulate troops units into following their orders. A vocation spy officially impersonating a troops officer is, to me, the height of ignominy.

In and of itself, the U.S. Armed troops has come to be a self-perpetuating and autonomous theory within a republic and under the total command of one menagerial official, the President. This is basically why the President, Secretary of Defense, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff totally resent constitutionally mandated congressional oversight. This health has resulted not from the application of law, but, rather, from the indulgent allowances offered by the Congress to the chief menagerial ever since George Washington issued the first presidential rule without congressional consent. Though strange, unchallenged traditions can finally be claimed to possess the corollary of located law, even if they clearly violates the letter of the U.S. Constitution. I personally believe that what is clearly unconstitutional cannot be made constitutional by capricious declarations of the U.S. Supreme Court. If this be so, a higher law should appropriately intervene to reverse such a ruling. And such a higher law should only be a vocally dissenting majority of the U.S voting age population, which unites to oppose and abolish such an illegality.

It may be presumed that George W. Bush's up-to-date nomination of Michael Hayden, an Army normal and old head of the Nsa, to head the Cia as Director of Central Intelligence, is a major step toward a fascist troops coming to brain gathering and covert unsanctioned operations. It is a matter of narrative that our sitting president has already, under a banner of national security, conspiratorially ordered the preparation of hidden foreign Cia prisons and an overall program of spying on the American public. In an endeavor much more technologically sinister than J. Edgar Hoover's covert tape recording of communal figures colse to the world, which the deranged man found sexually arousing, the Nsa has spied on and recorded millions of American telephone conversations. Dubya has used clandestine menagerial orders since early 2001 to authorize the Cia and agency of Defense to engage in extremely unscrupulous, if not illegal, activities. Case-in-point, a high-level Cia officer's hidden meeting with Osama Bin Laden at a French hospital where Bin Laden was undergoing renal surgery. This meeting was in August 2001, immediately prior to 9/11, while an existing order for Bin Laden's arrest had been in corollary since late 2000, signed by President Clinton. This particular Cia officer left Bin Laden resting comfortably after a suspicious two hour dialogue and immediately returned to Washington to narrative to his superiors at Langley. Why wasn't Bin Laden surveiled at the hospital and subsequently taken into custody? Was the Cia somehow involved in the subsequent 9/11 Wtc and Pentagon bombings? These questions were not posed by the 9/11 Commission for investigation. Why do you suppose this was so?

From the dawn of recorded history, the failure of developing governments to heed the lessons taught by the mistakes of previously fallen regimes has invariably resulted in sad replays of calamities perpetrated by deviously conspiring men and women of political and financial means. Most of these mistakes have been derived from the misuse of the troops in aggressive foreign procedure entanglements. The tragic Iraq War debacle is but a replay of the awful Vietnam saga, and the prevailing illicit machinations of the Bush administration are but a revisiting of the deceitful Nixon and Reagon years multiplied by a thousand. So when will it all stop? When will our supposedly wise and tantalizing leaders begin to learn from sad experience? By placing the troops in fee of the already semi-fascist U.S. brain community, the resulting corollary will be like putting the insatiable fox in the henhouse, and will only make existing matters worse. The American republic will be unable to continue withstanding the continued and resisted umbrage against its already wounded standard, the Constitution of the United States. As Thomas Jefferson sagaciously wrote in the notification of Independence, "That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to form new government, laying its foundations on such theory and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to corollary their protection and happiness." His words are as true now as they were then.

soldiery Intelligence: A True Oxymoron if not a hazardous Blend

Tags : todays world news headlines

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
 

Blogger